Previously proposed restrictions on Ukrainian military capabilities remain a point of serious contention. Earlier American peace frameworks included provisions forcing Ukraine to cap the size of its armed forces, terms that European allies found deeply problematic.
Such military limitations would leave Ukraine permanently vulnerable to future Russian aggression. European leaders argue that any sustainable peace must allow Ukraine adequate defensive capabilities rather than artificially constraining its ability to protect its territory.
The military cap proposal was part of a broader framework that heavily favored Russian interests. That plan would have granted Moscow control over territories it had not captured while preventing Ukraine from joining NATO, severely limiting Kyiv’s security options.
Although the specific plan has been revised, concerns persist that modified proposals might include similar restrictions in different forms. Ukrainian officials are working to ensure that any eventual agreement preserves their ability to maintain adequate national defense.
European allies emphasize that Ukraine must retain sufficient military capabilities to deter future aggression. They argue that peace settlements leaving Ukraine defenseless would prove unstable and could encourage renewed Russian military action.
